I was really, really happy to read that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have auctioned off a Ferrari Scuderia confiscated from a speeding motorist in Vancouver last September. The driver of the Ferrari was doing 200 kph (124 mph) in a 65 kph (40 mph) zone. He was racing against a motorist in a BMW M6, which will also be auctioned off. The Ferrari went for $306,000.
There have been reports that the Ferrari narrowly missed a woman and her children. Obviously, if the Ferrari had hit them at that speed, the incident would have become a front-page tragedy, with yet another family wiped out by a speeding motorist.
It is heartening to see the authorities taking this so seriously. As we know, BC now has the toughest drinking and driving laws in Canada. (So we should see less children killed by drunk drivers in future.) And confiscating a car is one of the worst punishments possible for our car-obsessed society (just as, conversely, winning a car is one of the greatest possible joys). To me, this means we are beginning to be able to see past the car myth, and privilege human life over cars. Wow! (Especially heartening given that I just read that in the USA, in the list of things that people say they want in order to have a good life, cars have just nudged children out of second place!)
But this is the part that puzzles me: why is it even legal to manufacture and sell cars that can go that fast, given that it is not legal to drive that fast anywhere?
For example, take my BionX electric bike, which I use for commuting. Because the Canadian speed limit for electric bikes is 32 kph (19 mph), the BionX is set up so that when the bike reaches 32 kph, the engine stops working. You’re back to foot power only. So the construction of the BionX actively prevents the cyclist from breaking the law.
The law tries to protect pedestrians from cyclists, by making it physically impossible for BionX bikes like this to go much faster than 32 kph (19 mph) – and that’s a good thing, because occasionally cyclists do kill pedestrians … but why is there no such restriction on vehicles such as the Ferrari Scuderia above, which can go a whole lot faster, and do so much more damage to human beings?
It is a mystery to me that the same kind of built-in restriction is not imposed on cars. I mean, seriously, how likely is it that the person who parted with $306,000 for that auctioned Ferrari will always drive it at a careful 50 kph (31 mph)?
If you liked this post, you might like one of my most popular posts, “As a matter of fact, we do own the road!” which explains why cyclists have every right to claim a safe space on the roads.
Did you like this post or find it useful? If so, please support our blog in one of these ways:
To support this blog, please consider clicking on one of the Amazon links before buying from Amazon. A small commission from Amazon helps pay for our time. It costs you nothing at all except a click. For more information, please see “How Our Affiliate Links Work” in the right-hand side bar (down below if you’re on a mobile) or our Policies page.
If you don’t want to buy anything, fair enough – but please consider supporting this blog by SHARING this post (using the Share buttons below) or by LIKING our Facebook page. BEST OF ALL – just SUBSCRIBE to our blog (click on the link below, next to Mrs. Average Joe Cyclist’s lovely face). It makes you part of our community, and makes sure you get free updates about all our posts, once a week. Thanks in advance – reader support keeps us going and makes it all worthwhile!
Why cars are manufactured for such speed has always been a mystery to me. It’s also one of their most sought after features.
Even the non-Ferrari end of the automobile product line is way too fast. My van speedometer goes up to 180 kph for some reason.
I have not even come across a theory about this, Rob … maybe it has something to do with selling features? You know the line “0 to 100 in 3 seconds, top speed 220 km” – somehow this makes the car attractive, even if the buyer has no intention of ever doing 220.
A comment and a question:
Cars don’t kill people, people kill people. Something tells me that the former owner of the Ferrari will likely be able to afford another vehicle, perhaps less awesome than the Scuderia, but likely capable of at least 160kph. Has the driver been banned from driving for life, or at least ten years or something of the sort? After all, the car didn’t do this on its own, and may be used for exactly the same purpose by its next owner. It’s a nice penalty, but hopefully it’s accompanied by some person-oriented sanctions, too.
The question: the speed limit for bicycles is 32kph? Can you give a reference for this, such as the BC Motor Vehicle Act? I was always under the impression that bicycles were subject to the ‘rules of the road’ (including the speed limit) just like every other vehicle. The only place I’ve ever come across bicycle-specific speed limits is on multi-use paths (greenways, seawall, etc…), but never on the road. Could you clarify and provide a reference?
Thanks,
-D
A
Sorry D, I am afraid I erred. I remembered the 32 kph speed limit from a while back – it was a number that stuck in my brain. After your query, I just RE-researched it, and realized I must have come across that info when I was researching buying my BionX electric bike kit. Apparently there is a law in Canada that ELECTRIC bikes cannot exceed 32 kph – see http://tap-canadablog.blogspot.com/2010/02/bionx-bike-hack.html. As far as I can see, there is no speed limit for regular bikes.
Thanks for bringing this up – I will amend the post 🙂
It truly is mind boggling as to why car manufactures make cars that go past 130 kph (140 tops).
Many truck and delivery companies put governors on their vehicles, perhaps it’s time to do the same with all cars.
Watching this show last week, they were showing this woman driving in the centre lane of a highway in Ontario. She said she was doing 140 kph…That’s not the real kicker. Cars were zooming by her on the left.
I’m not sure how it is across Canada, however when travelling on Ontario highways, there is now an unwritten rule that the speed limit is 120 kph (despite being 100). Many want is legally raised to 120 kph, no doubt so they can start travelling 140 kph.
It’s funny you mention the joy of winning a car. I watch Lets make a Deal and am always amazed at how people go bananas over the chance at winning a car. Most would rather win a $13,000 car compared to $15,000 in cash.
And the reaction to them winning things such as a scooter is priceless. Sort of an “oh, what am I suppose to do with that?”.
Personally, I would love to win a car. Only difference is I’d immediately sell it compared to most who would use it.
Hey Ryan. I was thinking of the joy of winning a car because I was watching “Biggest Loser” with Maggie. There was a Ford Fusion to be won. The joyful guy who won it said it would “change his life.”
I thought of how many peoples’ lives have been irrevocably changed by cars. Like the people in Ford Pintos that were burned to death. And the many people (including one contestant on the Biggest Loser) who lost their entire families in car crashes.
On the other hand, bikes will also change your life. But they are likely to change it by enabling you to lose weight, get healthy and fit, and EXTEND your life by 10 years. Granted you may also die on your bike – but that would probably be because cars exist, not because of anything inherent in the bike …
I would have thought a show such as the Biggest Loser who give money out as a prize, rather than a car?
I actually watch Tommy Europe’s last 10 pounds (which takes place in Vancouver). I give him full credit because he on multiply occasions has told the contestants to ride a bike or some of the challenges issued were to ride a bike.
hmm, did I just admit to watching a weight loss show?
Fraid you did just admit that Ryan. Note that I say “watched with Maggie” so that no one knows whether I CHOSE to watch it, or was just being a good partner. But since it’s confession time, I actually DO watch such shows. I lost 40 pounds a couple of years ago through exercise and diet, and I still need to shift at least another 30 – and even more if it is ever going to get EASY to bike uphill … so I watch the shows in the hope I will be inspired to get started again and lose the rest. In the meantime, my cycling commute keeps the lost pounds off.
I saw on CTV that the government is going to keep 20% of the Ferarri’s sale price, and 50% will go to the owner who was a relative of the driver, and 30% to the driver, and that for the BMW, 70% of the sale price will go to the driver. I guess they might just use that money to buy another high performance car. Hopefully not repeating this stunt afterwards…
Appears another person in BC (Campbell River) was caught doing over 200 km/h.
To make matters worse, he is a “new” driver and did this apparently on snow covered roads.
http://beta.ca.news.yahoo.com/driver-caught-doing-205-km-h-campbell-river.html